MPs are being handed huge subsidies to rent second homes in London whilst thousands of the capital’s poorest residents are being socially cleansed due to slashed benefits and soaring rents.
Unemployment Minister Esther McVey claimed a whopping £17,227 last year to rent a swanky central London pad whilst invisible Housing Minster Kris Hopkins trousered £18,045.
The total bill for MPs languishing in luxury properties at our expense came to over £5 million says pressure group Generation Rent who compiled the figures.
The maximum Housing Benefit available in London is just over £250 a week for a single person, around £100 a week less than McVey scrounges. This benefit goes to people in and out of work alike and was capped shortly after the current government weren’t elected. Soaring rents in London have meant that many new housing benefit claimants are working full time but still cannot afford the eye-watering cost of living in the capital.
Previously ministers, including Iain Duncan Smith, have claimed that there are plenty of properties still available in London to those affected by the cap. So why can’t McVey live in one of those instead of living on hand outs?
McVey earns far too much already to be eligible for housing benefit and in any case it is not payable for second homes, even if you claim you need them for work. She can easily afford to pay her own rent and if not then any state support she receives should be capped at the same level she expects everyone else to survive on. It’s about making the system fair after all, and it might even incentivise McVey to get a real job for once in her miserable life.
Above graph taken from an infographic produced by Generation Rent, for the full image visit their website
Follow me on twitter @johnnyvoid
the void 
She lives in her tax-payer funded London pad with Philip Davies MP, so in theory at least her expenses should be quite low.
Reblogged this on WorldWright's ….
I hope you have twitted this to McVey
It’s all about the rich, more they get more they want just plain greed.
Before this lot got in, we back on to a private school. £12.000 a term, they have spent millions on laying sport grounds, they already own every field about us, before this government got in, it was just a normal amount of pupils, it has expanded, takes a lot more pupils, infact this school seems to think they own the whole area, so this government has made the greed of the rich a fantastic life, while the normal folk, either working or on benefits a life of misery, the greed and cruelty on the normal people is no more than a lot of leaches, why do the normal people have to suffer at the hands of these greedy MP’s and the already rich
Reblogged this on UNEMPLOYED IN TYNE & WEAR.
Sounds like a petition is due to shame scrounger McVey. Some folk just don’t get paid that much. Does her MP boyfriend claim the same?
Looks like she normally claims the £1,600 a month rent.
http://www.parliamentary-standards.org.uk
Maybe they do it for record keeping purposes, but sometimes they claim for something as little as 45p. They all need locking up!
a f m
last yr 1 mp claimed 3p, travelling expenses!
We must end this something-for-nothing culture that allows parasitic MPs to leech off the rest of Society. Hard-Seeking Jobless British Workers are being taken for a ride by these thieving scumbags.
Nice one L.P, could have not said it any better or so eloquently.
they have absolutely ringfenced themselves against soaring inflation…their policies are intended to keep money pouring into their coffers, and sucked out of ours….this has left millions alone, isolated, fearful in the now, fearful of their future’s, depleted, and desperate, in a struggle to keep/maintain vitals of life…more and more people are fighting a losing battle against soaring inflation….
Esther McVey is a dirty scrounging little cunt.
This isn’t a surprise to most of us but we do need to get it into the press and while we are at it lets email this to everybody and everyone who might be interested.. or even not interested!
Why the F did Liverpool EVER vote for such a pile of shite?
They didn’t, Liverpool is a Conservative MP free zone, all Liverpool MPs are Labour.
Another Fine Mess, I stand corrected.
I used to work around there years ago, Liverpool center to West Wirral always seemed like quite a hike.
Hardly makes a difference really, I mean, the silence from the ranks of the Labour Party is deafening…
…..and we are letting them get away with it why aren,t we taking to the streets en masse .We did it when we were pissed off about the poll tax !!! sitting at our computers is doing nothing other than costing us electricity, we need to let them hear our voices !!!!!!!
I am with you Julie Appleby!!!!
We were watching BBC News yesterday when Nicola Sturgeon was on flapping her lips… can’t quite remember anything she said… because we we transfixed by the state of here TEETH, gaps, missing teeth, decaying teeth… disgusting! Maybe she is stuffing her face with those deep-fried Mars Bars like they do oop north in Scotchland!
Alistair Darling and his doomed “Better Together lol ” “campaign” sinks to a new low. The result of the Scottish Independence referendum WILL NOT be decided on the state of Nicola Sturgeon’s teeth.
Note to viewers south of the border: Nicola Sturgeon is a victim of the crap Scottish dental system which attacks children teeth with a drill as soon as they can open their mouth. It’s called ‘prophylactic treatment’ whereby perfectly healthy teeth are drilled ‘because the may decay at some time in the future’. Children at primary school are having root canal treatment. It is all to do with £money£ and it is destroying dental health. Of course Nicola Sturgeon has bad teeth but it is hardly her fault.
These guys are fucking brilliant when they are out on the streets playing live 🙂 but you will always get some bawbag shouting about the ‘fucking noise’ and threatening to ‘phone the polis’ lol 🙂
senga
they’re good, love it, then the tartan amoebas, peat bogs, chilly pipers, etc etc, then the amazing, late martin bennet….
“bawbag”…. would that be Kenny MacAskill, wee fat fascist Alex or Nicola “waggle yer wallies” Sturgeon lol
I tend to agree. I have had bare minimum of dental treatment and have pretty good teeth. They do look for problems where they don’t exist. I never go for check ups as they use that to make work for themselves.
Clanadonia, great band, will follow for sure!!!
t e j n s
must be gaps in your eyes…see 15mins into this debate, she’s got her dentures in…then in contrast there is that spoilt brat as mentioned above….
… it’s stowed oot and stappit foo…. 🙂
scottie
yeah great init, packed to the rafters meetings for yes, every night of the week….my fav is robin macalpine and the common weal of the jimmy reid foundation… 🙂
Dinky-doo… 🙂
“”We were watching BBC News yesterday when Nicola Sturgeon was on flapping her lips… can’t quite remember anything she said… because we we transfixed by the state of here TEETH, gaps, missing teeth, decaying teeth… disgusting! Maybe she is stuffing her face with those deep-fried Mars Bars like they do oop north in Scotchland!””
FUCK OFF!
overburdenddonkey has wet dreams about himself, Nichola Sturgeon and wee fat Alex Salmmon
If you look carefully at the data from IPSA you will see that Ester Mcvey and her partner, Philip Davies, claim (and are paid) £1625.00 per month EACH – Total £3250.00 per month – for their London flat. Whats the maximum housing benefit for a couple?
Searching for both names at the same time I can only see 1 month where they’ve both claimed Accommodation Rent, the site’s too confusing.
EstherMcVey Accommodation Rent 01/04/2013 £1,540.00
Philip Davies Accommodation Rent 24/04/2013 £1,625.00
Agree the ipsa site is fiddly! But it definately shows them both claiming – Mcveys claim detail states her claim is for half the rent. Also interesting to look at her train travel claims – shes not keen on mixing with the plebs!
Sid, £3250.00 per month claimed by Esther McVey and her partner Philip Davies sharing a property in London? Surely, that is not allowed? Is the rent that much money per month?
I think it must be that much – Mcveys claim states that it is for half the rent. I have no idea of London rents (thats why I was asking what the max housing benefit was). Where I live you can get somewhere very nice for a couple for 400 a month.
It is about time mc vey and the rest of them were only allowed the same amount for housing as those on benefits, infact they earn enough to pay their own housing as the working class have to do if they work away.
Sick of being tortured by NHS dentists with mythical qualifications.
Independence then a purge of all the progressive elite and their arty farty camp followers with their pretentious socialist values that they mutter with their mouths stuffed with gold. 🙂
Reblogged this on sdbast.
tories accuse oxfam of being political….
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-27783331
Oxfam should stop working with the Trussell Trust and FareShare these networks are being used to seriously undermine statutory and universal social security.
Email the tory wanker who is crying over Oxfam and tell him what you think
conor.burns.mp@parliament.uk
LEOPARDS NEVER CHANGE THEIR SPOTS, PCS IS AN OUT OF CONTROL STATE SPONSORED KILLING MACHINE.
“THEY HAVE LAID TO REST MORE BODIES, TEN TIMES MORE THAN WERE LOST ON THE DAY FOLLOWING THE NORMANDY LANDINGS”
EFFECTIVELY, THEY HAVE BECOME AN ELITE ASSASSINATION SQUAD OF THE DWP, HANDING OUT SANCTIONS AT AN UNPRECEDENTED SCALE TO MARRY UP TO THE TARGETS SET BY THEIR MASTERS………….
HUMAN FEELINGS WENT OUT OF THE WINDOW YEARS AGO, CLAIMANTS TREATED LIKE PURE SHIT, DAY IN, DAY OUT.
THE STAFF HAVE INDEED, BECOME ZOMBIES, ALIENATED FROM THE EVIL THEY COMMIT, HARDENED TO DENY BASIC HUMAN NEEDS TO THOSE MOST IN NEED.
ONCE YOU OVERCOME THE FIRST FEW ATROCITIES, THE INTENSITY OF HATRED ESCALATES TO A FEVER PITCH, THE THIRST TO COMMIT MORE EVIL TAKING OVER FROM NORMAL HUMAN EMOTION.
YOU CANNOT EXPECT A DOG WHIPPED INTO SUBMISSION BY A CRUEL OWNER TO SUDDENLY REBEL.
THE PCS IS A SPINELESS ORGANISATION REIGNED BY AN EQUALLY SPINELESS INDIVIDUAL, SERWOTKA.
SERWOTKA IS WHAT I WOULD CALL A FIRM’S MAN, WEARING TWO HATS AND LOOKING FOR HIS JUST REWARD, PROBABLY A KNIGHTHOOD…………………………..
“UNION PRINCIPLES ARE ALWAYS BUILT ON THE WAY IT’S MEMBERS TREAT OTHERS, SADLY THE PCS ABANDONED THIS ASPECT WHEN THEY GAVE ALLEGIANCE TO THE CRAZED KILLERS THAT ULTIMATELY CONTROL THEM”
THE PCS ARE GUILTY OF MANY THINGS, BUT PRETENDING TO SHOW REMORSE FOR THEIR SICKENING ACTIONS IS NOTHING SHORT OF PRETENCE.
UNITY IS BASED ON SOLIDARITY, THESE COCKSUCKERS HAVE NOT AN OUNCE OF SOLIDARITY, ALREADY COWERING TO THEIR MASTERS PROJECTED TARGETS, WEASELS ON A PIANO WIRE………..
PASSING RESOLUTIONS AT A CONFERENCE IS SO EASY……………..
FAR EASIER THAN UPSETTING THE BIG BAD WOLF THAT BREATHES DOWN YOUR NECK AT WORK.
SPINELESS WOULD BE A COMPLIMENT, THE PCS ARE MORE AFRAID OF HAVING THEIR PERSONAL MONEY STOPPED AS THOSE THEY DO IT TO, ON A DAILY BASIS…………………..
PCS union members sanctioning above and beyond the call of duty. They even write unnecessary personal attacks in their appeal rebuttals.
In South America, who were the first to suffer from neo-con policies forced on them with regime change to fascist military dictators (so much admired by our own royals & aristos) the opposition “disappeared” in the 10’s of thousands.
Death by DWP is our own modern version. They are the “disappeared” from the dole queue, the benefit budget, from OUR LIVES.
I’ve left a pithy comment on his Facebook page… There are, predicatbaly perhaps, many more comments that aren’t very flattering to Mr Burns… Will also e-mail the idiot.
DWP lied to the Scottish Parliament and the UK Parliament – the DWP and jobcentre plus are totally discredited.
15. This is why there can never be a target for sanctions, and why the Coalition Government abandoned the practice of benchmarking in 2011. That there are targets is a commonly levelled charge, which was investigated and published in a report Conditionality and sanctions a report to the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions. And the recent Select Committee enquiry into Jobcentre Plus concluded targets did not exist. – DWP evidence to the Scottish Welfare Committee.
A review of the benefits sanctions regime has been called for by a group of MSPs in another critical report of the welfare system.
Sanctions brought in by the UK government mean benefits can be withdrawn for reasons such as leaving a job or not attending an interview.
The Welfare Reform Committee at Holyrood has recommended a number of changes to how the regime operates.
Convenor Michael McMahon described the current welfare system as “broken”.
He said: “When Neil Couling from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) came to committee and said people welcomed the jolt of being sanctioned, the committee was shocked.
“Our evidence says quite the opposite; being sanctioned leaves people with not enough money to make ends meet, certainly not enough to go out job hunting.
“The system is so broken that many people do not know why they have been sanctioned, which totally undermines the DWP assertion that sanctions ‘teach’ people a lesson.”
He added: “How many of us could manage if we did not get paid one week, without any notice or, often, explanation? This demonstrates once again the enormous gulf between reality and DWP thinking.”
The committee said sanctions should only be used as a last resort for those who have consistently and deliberately refused to engage with job seeking requirements without good reason.
It suggested people should receive a written warning at the first breach before it is escalated to a sanction, to act as a deterrent and not a punishment.
People should also have at least 10 working days’ notice prior to a sanction being applied and be told of the reason for the sanction, while sanctions should be applied appropriately and consistently and with greater levels of discretion and support, the committee recommended.
Conservative committee member Alex Johnstone dissented from the report’s findings.
‘Safety net’
A spokeswoman for the DWP said: “Sanctions are only used as a last resort, but it’s only right that people claiming benefits should do everything they can to find work, if they are able.
“We make it clear to people at the start of their claim what the rules are and that they risk losing their benefits if they don’t play by them.
She added: “People who are in genuine need can apply for hardship payments. If someone disagrees with a decision made on their claim, they can appeal.”
Scotland’s Welfare Minister Margaret Burgess said: “Our analysis, published last December, also found that the regime is hitting the most disadvantaged groups in society, such as disabled people and lone parents, the hardest.
“This report clearly shows that the current sanctions regime isn’t working. We need to start again with a more positive and proportionate approach designed to support people, not cut off their incomes.”
Welfare sanctions system ‘broken’ says MSP report
“The committee said sanctions should only be used as a last resort for those who have consistently and deliberately refused to engage with job seeking requirements without good reason.” – this is not too dissimilar to the Citizens’ Advice Bureau’s position. Perhaps the the Committee should try and “engage” with the ever-changing, increasingly impossible to meet Dystopian “job-seeking requirements” that jobseekers face. We must also remember that when sanctions were first introduced by the Blair government they were to be used only as a “last resort”; look where we are now!
Benefit Sanctions are State Terrorism and Must be Stopped WITHOUT EXCEPTION
“Sanctions are only used as a first resort”.
Incredible that this can be & is what’s happening.
The first time an ‘adviser’ asked whether I would like a sanction or that I might prefer to give any reaons in mitigation, they very simply said a stoppage “could” be applied. Their introducing this possibility was studiously matter-of-fact and carefully neutral tone – it was said almost as an aside. As if they presumed that – as a newish signer-on, i should be a) aware of and fully expecting the possibility or the likelihood of all income being withdrawn at a moment’s (or no) notice, for an unspecified time, and also, b) they were completely relaxed about the procedure/process being as a routine/regular part of their JCP (sanctioneer’s) role.
The obvious questions seemed to be – exactly – how was someone – anyone – under a sanction expected/thought to be going to survive/manage not being paid the full amount of JSA – for an indeterminate period of time – when at the same time not knowing until the money was due whether or not it would not arrive? Given that a person is signing on in the first place, by definition they are unlikely to have recourse to ‘independent means’. It seems worth knowing how much of the total 2weekly amount “may not be” expected to arrive (innocent times); for how long a period of time “might” JSA not be paid (adviser not having attempted to explain such trivial details – and having instead given only the vaguest, but still extremely disturbing & surreal, hints that, “this may – or then again, may not, be going to happen”).
Questions about a potential sanction don’t not merit a straight answer; nothing within JCP- walls is a foregone conclusion or is part of a logical or predictable/consistent pattern – other than that a sanction is likely to be applied, or attempts made, at some point(s) – or the adviser will die trying. Likely reactions to requests for more detailed explanations are mildly surprised looks implying, “why are you questioning this? What is your probem?” alongside raised eyebrows and a swift, unarguable-with stepping-aside from the process (“A decision maker will decide – not me – I just process the information. I have no choice …”). Any attempt to say that this would never happen anywhere else – eg. in paid employment where wages wouldn’t be unpaid without notice for minor (real or imagined) infringements of the rules only meets with almost-amused seeming looks (of course, they are amused) – it’s so ‘hilarious’.
Two years on from that first rude introduction to the concept of starving innocent people and potentially making them lose their home/sanity, the effects of the sanction threat being levelled haven’t & probably never will go away. Describe the system as “broken” seems to understate the case. Maybe “repellant”; “inhuman”; “barbaric” – but certainly it’s up and running & seemingly working full speed ahead.
Not starving “innocent” people – starving people in general (it’s ridiculous to make a distinction) – supposed to refer to the inherent injustice that it’s been deemed ok to do this to people for no good reason – as there can be no good reason … @pre-watercannon.
Have we allowed this to be done to anyone who not able to sustain regular signing-on or able to provide an address for some time now, meanwhile? (those people living in the town/city centres who clearly do not have access to enough food). We already accept this without going into individual people’s circumstances so if there’s an (exponential) increase in the numbers, is that the perfect cover for the JCP/DWP/IDS …
No sanctions are ever acceptable. Most of the time that people ‘refuse’ to go along with the system is becasue the system is trying it’s level best to force them into unsuitable work that pays abysmally – no one should be forced into a situation like that. Work should pay, and pay enough to cover a person’s living requirements, and also enough to pay for some of the nicer things in life, such as a decent social life, and the odd holiday. Our society is a wealthy society that could easily afford all that, and a lot more besides, if it were not for the fat cat capitalists and the hangers on of the aristiocracy and royal family.
Much of this perceived problem would just go away if a basic Citizen’s Income were introduced that entitled everyone to enough for a basic lifestyle that wasn’t taken away upon gaining employment – it could happen, but unless we insist it’s likely to be argued down, not becuase it’s ‘unaffordable’ (though intuitively that is the first reaction) but becuase it would empower people too much and force employers to pay a decent wage if they wanted to get workers.
Reblogged this on Beastrabban’s Weblog.
sanctions only used as a last resort ???? bull shit!! every cunt i know is under one!!! nazi bastards
“THESE ARE JUST TWO QUOTES MADE BY THE DWP WITHIN A COUPLE OF WEEKS OF EACH OTHER”
1/ Atos is contracted to support the delivery of learning of Decision Makers who make decisions
in respect of how a health condition affects a claimants daily life and capability for work.
2/ In response, Atos Healthcare are not involved in the training of DWP Decision Makers in making
benefit decisions, this training is provided in-house within DWP.
…………….IT WOULD SEEM THAT EVERYTHING THE DWP SAY’S IS A PACK OF LIES…..
“THE DWP NEED TIME TO WORK OUT A STRATEGY TO WITHHOLD INFORMATION THAT SHOULD BE READILY AVAILABLE”
……………………….ALONG WITH THE MUCH AWAITED MORTALITY STATISTICS THAT THEY THINK EVERYONE HAS NOW FORGOTTEN ABOUT……………………………………….
Dear R S Van Spall,
Thank you for your Freedom of Information request received on 29 April 2014.
You asked:
Can you please supply data relating to ‘Hardship payments’ following JCP sanctions,
since the introduction of ‘Hardship payments’
Please include amount of applications, cost of payments and any other relevant data.
We are writing to advise you that the time limit for responding to your request for information
which was received on 29 April 2014 needs to be extended.
It is occasionally necessary to extend the 20 working day time limit for issuing a response. In
the case of your request, we need to extend the time limit because the information requested
must be considered under one of the exemptions to which the public interest test applies. This
extra time is needed in order to make a determination as to the public interest.
Accordingly, we hope to let you have a response by 26 June 2014.
If you have any queries about this letter please contact us quoting the reference number
above.
Yours sincerely,
DWP Central FoI Team
“How long till the tinderbox of public dissent finally ignites?”
……………….whilst the media reports of a UK that is unknown to the people up north,Sainsbury’s have just reported the worst drop in sales in nine years!.
Are the water cannons to cool the celebrating plebs in Trafalgar Square this year, or an addition to the emergency gun laws yet to be announced prior to the full scale riots?
The increase in job security, half a days pay once a week at minimum rate is just the tonic we desperately needed…………….
Everybody i talk to is owed money by the DWP and dangling close to the edge. The addition of a multi grand new stage coach for old wrinkly made me feel a lot happier though.
Just what the country needed for her who has done fuck all, all her life……….
“YOU SUCK ON YOUR GREASY VENISON WHILE YOUR SUBJECTS BEG AT THE FOODBANKS”
People could accuse me of being bitter?
OF COURSE I FUCKING AM!!!
JUST LIKE MOST OTHERS WHO LIVE OUTSIDE OF THE SUBURBS OF “SHANGRILA” LONDON’S SQUARE MILE.
…………….misinformation, twisted statistics, in the pocket media, thieving welfare departments, mass unemployment, homelessness, food banks, bedroom tax, evictions and child poverty hitting a new high……….
ALL THE INGREDIENTS OF THE SEVENTH RICHEST ECONOMY IN THE WORLD…………
“SCOTLAND, CAN WE JOIN YOU IN SAYING FUCK OFF TO WESTMINSTER, ONCE AND FOR ALL?”
geoff
“SCOTLAND, CAN WE JOIN YOU IN SAYING FUCK OFF TO WESTMINSTER, ONCE AND FOR ALL?” yes, you can! the people of scotland entered yorkshire into a raffle, and yorkshire won 1st prize…from the 1st july 2014 yorkshire, is to become inveryorkshire as a new region of scotland, congratulations..no lack of pies in scotland!…
Do you honestly think the DWP are withholding the mortality statistics for fear of being challenged for acts of genocide against the people?
…………..or whether the office for national statistics intend to use ATOS reports that claim those who have died, are now fit for work?
geoff
yes and liars/bullies never like to see or admit what they are doing…so it is at very least a double dip delusion….yes to the 2nd post link…all out of sight out of mind like a small child covers its face to make themselves invisible… (-: 🙂
IF THERESA MAY GAVE THE OFFICIAL NOD FOR THE DEPLOYMENT OF BORIS’S WATER CANNONS TODAY, THEY COULD TEST THEM OUT ON THE IRATE TAXI DRIVERS……………………
WHO IN TURN COULD BRING THE CAPITAL TO IT’S KNEES IN A MATTER OF MINUTES…………………….
Westminster council would never agree to it 🙂
The DWP in total meltdown millions of citizens forced into social insecurity in what is the most serious threat to the wellbeing and subsistence of the British peoples since the Second World War, the question is what happens next?
Self employment nonsense.
Zandra lives with her husband in a comfortable, leafy suburb, in Hertfordshire.
So just a typical unemployed JSA claimant then.
“I did a lot of market research and the response I got was, ‘Yes that’s great, we’d sell that.’
Great, making and selling wooden like toys can’t be that hard.
The products are manufactured in Poland.
Yep, just the type of entrepreneurs we need.
Now in its sixth year of trading, she hopes to finally turn a profit.
Oh, dear.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-27397993
a f m
yes, just what we need a retail economy, where we make nothing in the uk….guess what the working class local economy is sucked dry by the inevitable productivity collapsing bag vacuum that this always creates…see robin macalpine vids on utub….the jimmy reid foundation….
Well at least their savings/pensions are keeping the rest of the world employed. After splurging for 6 years her husband must be wishing they’d just got a cat instead!
a f m
my thoughts exactly…. 🙂
If you ask me “Fairy Tale Furniture” is a hobby not a business!
I play the lottery and I hope to break even after 14 million odd years.
IDS wouldn’t think much of her business he expects new businesses to be profitable within the first month …but then he also lives in Fairy Tale land. He’s probably her main customer (via the taxpayer expense claims of course!).
She loves the flexibility of being self-employed.
“I can work at midnight if I want to, I can take a longer lunch if I want to – especially when the weather is good – and I can make the time up later. I just love it, I love all of it. It’s fun.”
………….JUST LIKE ZERO HOURS REALLY. THE FLEXIBILITY OF WONDERING WHERE YOUR NEXT OUT OF DATE CREAM CRACKER IS COMING FROM AS YOU ADJUST THE CARDBOARD BOX TO STOP THE HOMELESS SPIKES DIGGING IN YOUR SCRAWNY BACK……………..
……………..and neatly tucked away;
Money worries are blamed as a key cause of suicidal feelings as the Samaritans in Wales report their highest number of calls for five years.
“I can work at midnight if I want to, I can take a longer lunch if I want to – especially when the weather is good – and I can make the time up later. I just love it, I love all of it. It’s fun.”
And then she wonders why she hasn’t made a profit in 6 years, hope she’s not claiming any tax credits.
Woman driver who ran over and killed a pedestrian gets less than HALF the sentence victims of the Community Work Programme will receive
A driver who killed a woman after reversing over her at a garden centre in East Ayrshire has been ordered to carry out 300 hours of unpaid work.
UC Steaming ahead on time and on budget – into the abyss.
“DWP estimated that there would be 1,355 UC appeals in 2013-14 and 77,926 UC appeals in 2014-15. In fact, by the end of March 2014, due to the tiny number of claimants who have been able to claim UC, there had been just three appeals.”
http://www.benefitsandwork.co.uk/news/2789-dwp-believes-universal-credit-is-dead-tribunal-president-reveals
Reblogged this on Britain Isn't Eating.
Terima kasih, informasi yang Saya dapat dari web ini sangat bermanfaat sekali.
Salam dari :
Poker Online, Game Facebook, Judi Online, Nagapoker
Evil Tory cunt Kris Hopkins says landlords should evict Housing benefit claimants:
http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/11297544.Keighley_MP_under_fire_over_comments_about_tenants_on_housing_benefit/
Pingback: MP's Scrounging Is Out Of Control: Cap Esther M...
Reblogged this on Samara4baghad's Blog.