Workfare Falls Over and Almost Dies … For Now

In a major victory for campaigners, the concessions made to the Government’s workfare schemes after the recent storm of protest are far greater than Employment Minister Chris Grayling first suggested.

A recent response to a Freedom of Information request reveals that any referral to workfare must now be entirely voluntary on not just the Work Experience scheme for young people, but also the Sector Based Work Academies scheme and the Government’s flagship Work Programme.

DWP staff are now being told to take immediate steps to ensure that no
claimant of any age is sanctioned under the existing rules for failing to take
up, attend or leaving the Jobcentre Plus Work Experience scheme, the Work
Experience element of sector-based work academies and work experience
arranged by Work Programme providers:”

This is only ‘temporary’ guidance, which suggests it may change once the workfare row has died down.  More importantly, Mandatory Work Activity, the scheme under which claimants can be sentenced to a months unpaid work on the whims of Jobcentre staff, is not included in the new guidance.

The Guardian has already revealed that some young people who turn down a Work Experience placement have been forced onto Mandatory Work Activity.  Last year George Osborne seemed to suggest this is Government policy when he said that “Young people who don’t engage with this offer [of work experience] will be considered for mandatory work activity”.

Trying to get the truth out of either the DWP or lying bastard Chris Grayling is near impossible, but it is highly likely that people who refuse to go on one workfare scheme may simply be sent on another.

Even under these new guidelines, sanctions will still exist on the Work Programme, the largest and most expensive scheme which has been inflicted on almost 400,000 claimants so far.  This means any training, job search sessions, and all the other crap that private sector poverty pimps like A4e  dream up will still be mandated and failure to attend will lead to loss of benefits.

So whilst (according to the rules at least) people can not currently be sent on workfare, it is likely that some people will be forced to sit around in A4e’s garish offices fighting over out of date newspapers for up to 30 hours a week.  A recent account of life at A4e reveals this rip off company to be little more than a fucking embarrassment.

Jobcentre staff, under pressure from above, now have unprecedented powers to sanction claimants.  Despite this new guidance it is possible that claimants may still be sanctioned under Job Seekers Agreement rules, or even that this guidance will not fully filter through to front line workers.  Whilst the Work Experience was always technically voluntary, in practice many young people were told it was mandatory.  This is an area the PCS, the union which represents Jobcentre staff, could help with, simply by reiterating to their members what the rules actually are and asking them to be followed.  Too many Jobcentre staff seem to take relish in punishing benefit claimants, a reflection of the culture in the DWP and the wider benefit bashing campaigns in the media.  The PCS should be working to change this culture.

Sanctions can also still be applied to sick and disabled claimants referred onto the Work Programme in the Work Related Activity Group (WRAG).  Shamefully it is largely the responsibility of charities involved in the Work Programme to refer their users to the DWP for sanctions.  Almost 10,000 sick and disabled people were subject to benefit sanctions last year.  Some of them will have been referred by the Work Programme charitable sub-contractors  such as MIND, Mencap and the Leonard Chesire Foundation.

It is also charities who will benefit from the remaining two workfare schemes – Mandatory Work Experience and the new Community Action Scheme, under which long term unemployed people can be sent on six months workfare.  Both these schemes stipulate that the work must be of benefit to the community, and  by and large most placements so far have been with charities.  Unfortunately, in a probable breach of Freedom of Information rules, the DWP are refusing to say who those charities are.

Tesco and other corporate scum rejected sanctions at their cosy meeting with Chris Grayling.   The charitable sector however has not been so forthcoming.

It is charities who are now propping up forced labour, and the DWP is helping them keep their dirty little workfare secrets safe.

Despite all of this, the new guidelines represent a major fucking embarrassment for Chris Grayling who has claimed many times that no-one has been mandated to workfare for private companies on the Work Programme.  A pending Freedom of Information request should tell us this week whether the DWP are prepared to admit the minister in charge is a lying piece of shit.

It appears that the Work Programme is in meltdown behind the scenes.  The private companies contracted to deliver the scheme are likely to react with fury to these new guidelines.  Mandatory workfare was at the heart of many of their Work Programme activities.  Sending someone off to stack shelves in Tesco for free was by far one of the cheapest ways to look like they were actually doing something for their billions.  They will no doubt be demanding more money and lower targets due to the changes.

Confusion is likely to reign both within the DWP and the Work Programme contractors.  Resistance to unpaid work in all it’s forms looks set to continue.  No-one can believe a word Chris Grayling says anymore, whilst the Secretary of State ultimately responsible, Iain Duncan Smith, seems to have disappeared from public life.

The Welfare Reform Bill has only just passed into law and already Welfare Reform is an omni-shambolic farce.  This Government couldn’t run an egg and spoon race.

16 responses to “Workfare Falls Over and Almost Dies … For Now

  1. I to am sick to death of receiving babbling bullshit to FOI requests and as you say they are being changed to suit or deleted from public view but not from browser caches.

    Does anyone know if it is illegal this breach of conduct regards the above FOI’s when the information has already been given out publicly as fact?

    I just hope all this illegal tampering by government departments can be proved in court at some stage where they will have to then sit up and take notice.

  2. I think Ian Duncan Smith must have retired to a monastery to flagellate himself for his sins.

    After all he has been the reason so many people have committed suicide over their loss of benefits when still very ill, courtesty of the atos/workfare regime.

    As a good Catholic he knows the Church teaches that those who commit suicide are condemned to hell forever…..

    So what is the punishment for the man who left them with no choice but to commit this (in his eyes) cardinal “sin”. Will God forgive HIM but not his victims?

    I wonder if he’s deluded enough to thinks so?

  3. Samuel Miller has sent a brilliant letter to Grayling. I can’t wait for the reply which we should all demand.

    http://www.twitlonger.com/show/h252bt

    Please if you can, support him via twitter @Hephaestus7. He has done so much hard work to bring what is happening here to the attention of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

  4. What about Work Choice, and worfare like schemes for the sick and disabled on ESA WRAG are we still expected to work indefinitely with sanctions if we dont? Dxxx

  5. Well said. Great article. We have shared this article on the Pat’s Petition Face Book. Please share and get every one to sign Pat’s Petition at – http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/20968 Share button on petition. Together we can get the government to stop and put this right.

  6. Arbeitsscheu_UK

    Well if the plan is to withhold the names of #workfare charities that can only be for one reason – to protect their reputations. If their reputations would be tarnished from their involvement in #workfare why are they participating in the first place? The task must be to expose them, and if people are being mandated to work for them that should hardly prove difficult as they should be happy to share the guilty secret.
    They are already under fire with their tax dodging wealthy donors. Because they are able avoid having their taxes going to the treasury by ‘donating’ the money instead, why should the tax payer be forced to subsidise charlatans whose cause they may not even support? The charities are putting real shops out of business by competing with them selling new goods yet the charities are only paying a fraction of the council tax/business rates which real stores have to pay. Therefore the council tax payers are forced to subsidise them.
    On top of that we have to run the gauntlet of their chuggers on the high street and they benefit from free labour once again funded by the tax payer. No wonder so many see them, and their £150k CEO’s, as the enemy.

  7. Eric Greenwood

    Many Many moons ago, I used to work for the DSS as it was in a backroom way I would send out the forms to fill in. It was KNOWN that at that time there was a competition. The staff could win prizes for the amount of people they got off the books, Now if this was a job that wouldnt be so bad, but it was off the books sanctions etc. you would win holidays, and I think one person won a car..They have said this has been stopped..

  8. Pingback: Workfare Doesn’t Help Young People Find Work | the void

  9. michelle jones

    I can tell you exactly why these schemes have been made voluntary ”temporarily” and it’s because Cait Reilly’s court action against these schemes along with a couple of other people who are suing the government comes before the Royal Courts of Justice in May/June so Grayling and Dunkin’ Donuts Smith want the best possible chance of winning the case so are therefore hoping that by the time it’s in the Courts they can say to the Judge ”see malad, it’s all voluntary, these people can leave whenever they want, were just trying to help them to become employable blah blah blah…..” and then if they win the case you can bet your life that the ”temporarily voluntary” part of the scheme will be removed quicker than you can blink. DO NOT TRUST THIS VERMIN IN GOVERNMENT.

  10. Pingback: Why won’t people work for nothing? | Edinburgh Eye

  11. Pingback: Even Without Sanctions Workfare Is Still A Wealth Grab By The Rich | the void

  12. Pingback: Farewell Emma, Farewell A4e – Come to the Goodbye Party! | the void

  13. Pingback: Farewell Emma, Farewell A4e – Come to the Goodbye Party! « Benefit Claimants Fightback

  14. Pingback: Holland & Barrett Face Pickets and Occupations! | the void

  15. Pingback: Workfare Isn’t Working So Grayling Plans More Workfare – This Time It’s For Charity | the void

  16. Frances I will only sign a petition if it is anonymous!!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s